Proof review
For: Prospects who need to understand current evidence before deeper work.
Outcome: Proof packet, claim boundaries, and fit/no-fit recommendation.
Investor diligence
The homepage is customer-first. This page routes investors into the diligence path: proof-bound claims, paid evaluations, IP protection, licensing potential, and ASIC feasibility review.
Positioning
ATOMiK is a state-aware compute architecture that helps edge and embedded teams reduce wasted state movement by tracking meaningful change instead of repeatedly moving, scanning, syncing, replaying, or rebuilding full state.
Diligence focus
Investor diligence should use the same claim discipline as customer evaluation. Do not turn evaluation targets into proven universal outcomes.
Buyer journey
For: Prospects who need to understand current evidence before deeper work.
Outcome: Proof packet, claim boundaries, and fit/no-fit recommendation.
For: Teams with one workload, one baseline, and one painful constraint.
Outcome: Workload map, metric plan, and evaluation readout.
For: Qualified teams where an early ATOMiK path could affect product or architecture decisions.
Outcome: Scoped collaboration around measured value and integration risk.
For: Chip, embedded, infrastructure, and strategic partners evaluating ATOMiK as IP.
Outcome: Proof-bound IP, hardware, ASIC feasibility, and licensing review.
For: Investors reviewing the transition from proof to evaluated customer/IP opportunities.
Outcome: Evidence map, paid-evaluation strategy, IP status, and ASIC feasibility path.
Proof packet
Benefits such as reduced heat, lower water burden, longer battery life, lower power, smaller footprint, or faster execution are evaluation targets unless a linked artifact measures that exact outcome.
Artifact map
The public site links to the evidence and benchmark page, hardware proof map, claims registry, and evidence labels.
Evidence labels
Claims are separated as live measured, hardware validated, software validated, formal proof, synthesis validated, build artifact, projected, conceptual, or roadmap.
Claim control
The registry records public-safe claims, artifacts, caveats, and overclaim risks for current public materials.
Hardware validated
ATOMiK Desk v0.40-A is the current UI captured live from /dev/fb0 on Zynq hardware, with on-screen metrics driven by real measured on-board data. It is not proof of power, thermal, uptime, or production maturity.
Live measured
An 8-bank XOR accumulator on the AX7020 scaled linearly with allocated banks (1/2/4/8x fewer cycles, about 100-800 Mdeltas/s at 100 MHz), measured with an on-chip cycle counter. The result was byte-identical across every bank count and matched a software recompute - order-independent and lock-free by construction. It is the throughput substrate, not a customer-workload speedup or power claim.
Live measured
The Workloads surface (real-time telemetry aggregation) runs on the AX7020 over HDMI driven by live measured throughput from the parallel-bank engine: 800 Mevents/s at 8 banks, with byte-identical results across configs. The first customer-facing workload demo proven end-to-end on hardware. Throughput is measured; it is a static capture, not an interactive session.
Live measured
The redesigned Workloads surface shows conventional-vs-ATOMiK side by side on the AX7020: an edge-telemetry sync tick moves 2,048 bytes conventionally vs 160 bytes as deltas (92% less data moved), and 256 control updates coalesce into 32 net writes (87% fewer). Every delta was verified on the ATOMiK adapter with exact 64-bit round-trips using a falsification-tested harness, and the demo self-drives through all three scenarios untethered. Figures are for deterministic test patterns (ratios scale with change density and locality); static captures, not an interactive session.
Live measured
All three customer Workloads scenarios on the AX7020 with the production typography: telemetry sync (92% less data), control coalescing (87% fewer writes), and parallel aggregate (8x faster). The two memory scenarios are adapter-verified with exact 64-bit round-trips; parallel is measured on the bench engine. Ratios are pattern-dependent, not universal multipliers; static captures, not interactive.
Hardware validated
The Linux userspace proof validates the path from user process through Linux, MMIO, Wishbone CSR bus, and FPGA accelerator for algebraic checks.
Live measured
The matrix shows ATOMiK can win in specific coalesced/batched scenarios and lose in others. Use it with the interpretation caveats.
Formal proof
Formal proof work is present in the repository. Public pages should avoid unaudited proof counts unless the count is verified across repo, site, and deck.
Synthesis validated
Synthesis and toolchain outputs are useful evidence but must not be blended with live-board measurements.
Roadmap / conceptual
Concept visuals explain product direction only. They are not proof of current commercial functionality.
What capital de-risks
Paid design-partner evaluations against real workload constraints.
Stronger IP protection and diligence materials.
ASIC feasibility review before any production tape-out decision.
Proof packaging that keeps claims tied to artifacts.
Do not over-read
The AX7020 matrix shows workload-dependent behavior. Formal proof work exists but public pages avoid unaudited proof counts. Concept and roadmap visuals show direction, not commercial readiness.
The right review starts with the proof packet, claims registry, customer evaluation motion, IP status, and ASIC feasibility path.
Investor Diligence
